<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel>
<title>Jonathan Leake — AI and mathematics</title><link>https://www.jleake.com/blog/</link><description>Ideas, predictions, and hope for the future of research mathematics.</description><language>en</language>
<atom:link href="https://www.jleake.com/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item><title>What&#39;s wrong with proving frontier models?</title><link>https://www.jleake.com/blog/proving-models/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.jleake.com/blog/proving-models/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>AI companies are using open conjectures to prove intelligence of their models. We don&#39;t like it, but maybe it can push us to find harder and more interesting conjectures that frontier models can&#39;t solve.</description></item><item><title>Where we go from here</title><link>https://www.jleake.com/blog/first-post/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.jleake.com/blog/first-post/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>After the Navier-Stokes solution, I was gripped by anxiety about the future of my career and of research mathematics generally. What followed was then my first attempt at some idea of how research math could continue, the idea of &quot;human compression&quot;.</description></item>
</channel></rss>
